<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 970 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265695</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision against the appellant, stating that they did collect excise duty and the demanded amount could be paid through CENVAT credit. The appeal was dismissed, and the outcome was unfavorable for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 970 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265695</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision against the appellant, stating that they did collect excise duty and the demanded amount could be paid through CENVAT credit. The appeal was dismissed, and the outcome was unfavorable for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>