<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 968 - CESTAT MUMBAI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265693</link>
    <description>The tribunal, by majority opinion, held that the department failed to conclusively prove the clandestine removal of the alleged quantity of TMT/CTD bars. The evidence presented was insufficient to establish the charges beyond doubt. The tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals and quashing the penalties imposed on the appellants. The judgment highlighted the need for concrete evidence and adherence to principles of natural justice in adjudication processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 17:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401388" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 968 - CESTAT MUMBAI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265693</link>
      <description>The tribunal, by majority opinion, held that the department failed to conclusively prove the clandestine removal of the alleged quantity of TMT/CTD bars. The evidence presented was insufficient to establish the charges beyond doubt. The tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals and quashing the penalties imposed on the appellants. The judgment highlighted the need for concrete evidence and adherence to principles of natural justice in adjudication processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>