<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 967 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265692</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld duty payment under the EOU clause but rejected the appellant&#039;s plea to calculate duty based on selling price. Penalties imposed under incorrect sections were set aside, and confiscation of goods and penalties on appellant No.3 were annulled. All three appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 14:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 967 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265692</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld duty payment under the EOU clause but rejected the appellant&#039;s plea to calculate duty based on selling price. Penalties imposed under incorrect sections were set aside, and confiscation of goods and penalties on appellant No.3 were annulled. All three appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>