<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 946 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265671</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision in favor of the Assessee, ruling against the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Court found the Assessee&#039;s method of separately valuing &#039;levy&#039; and &#039;free sale&#039; sugar to be justified, citing consistency in accounting practices and past acceptance by the Department. Consequently, the addition made by the AO towards the valuation of closing stock was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 07:45:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 946 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265671</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision in favor of the Assessee, ruling against the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Court found the Assessee&#039;s method of separately valuing &#039;levy&#039; and &#039;free sale&#039; sugar to be justified, citing consistency in accounting practices and past acceptance by the Department. Consequently, the addition made by the AO towards the valuation of closing stock was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>