<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 944 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265669</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to treat the gains from share transactions as &#039;capital gains&#039;, emphasizing the investment intent and actual deliveries. Regarding the LTCG from a settlement agreement, the Tribunal approved the CIT(A)&#039;s computation, reducing the taxable amount. The Tribunal allowed indexation benefit on share application money and share capital, contrary to the CIT(A)&#039;s denial. In the case of double taxation of interest income, the Tribunal directed the AO to verify and avoid taxing the income again. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, instructing the AO to recompute LTCG and prevent double taxation of interest income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 07:45:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 944 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265669</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to treat the gains from share transactions as &#039;capital gains&#039;, emphasizing the investment intent and actual deliveries. Regarding the LTCG from a settlement agreement, the Tribunal approved the CIT(A)&#039;s computation, reducing the taxable amount. The Tribunal allowed indexation benefit on share application money and share capital, contrary to the CIT(A)&#039;s denial. In the case of double taxation of interest income, the Tribunal directed the AO to verify and avoid taxing the income again. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, instructing the AO to recompute LTCG and prevent double taxation of interest income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>