<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 937 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265662</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT (A) order, ruling that the surplus amount received by the assessee from a company was taxable as business profit under the head &#039;Profits and Gains from Business/Profession&#039;. The decision was based on the business nature of the transaction, considering the amount as revenue due to the lack of a formal agreement between the parties. The ITAT dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, emphasizing that the surplus was not compensation but business profit, aligning with the CIT (A) determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 07:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 937 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265662</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT (A) order, ruling that the surplus amount received by the assessee from a company was taxable as business profit under the head &#039;Profits and Gains from Business/Profession&#039;. The decision was based on the business nature of the transaction, considering the amount as revenue due to the lack of a formal agreement between the parties. The ITAT dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, emphasizing that the surplus was not compensation but business profit, aligning with the CIT (A) determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>