<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 41 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=690</link>
    <description>The CESTAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s application for rectification of mistakes in the Final Order, finding no errors. It clarified that the demand amount had been confirmed and appropriated correctly, distinguished payments made for periods outside the dispute, and upheld the benefit granted to the Party to avoid double taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 41 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=690</link>
      <description>The CESTAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s application for rectification of mistakes in the Final Order, finding no errors. It clarified that the demand amount had been confirmed and appropriated correctly, distinguished payments made for periods outside the dispute, and upheld the benefit granted to the Party to avoid double taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>