<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 928 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265653</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant, holding that the branch at Juchandra Naigaon qualified as a rural branch under section 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act. The decision was based on the specific population criteria of the village where the branch was located, aligning with the interpretation provided by the Kerala High Court in a similar case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 21:53:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 928 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265653</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant, holding that the branch at Juchandra Naigaon qualified as a rural branch under section 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act. The decision was based on the specific population criteria of the village where the branch was located, aligning with the interpretation provided by the Kerala High Court in a similar case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>