<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 914 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265639</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the restoration of the appeal concerning the excisability of polyester sewing thread, emphasizing the need to consider appeals on their merits. The judgment underscored the importance of fair adjudication processes, particularly when appellants are adversely affected by decisions, ensuring a just outcome in excise duty disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 19:51:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 914 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265639</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the restoration of the appeal concerning the excisability of polyester sewing thread, emphasizing the need to consider appeals on their merits. The judgment underscored the importance of fair adjudication processes, particularly when appellants are adversely affected by decisions, ensuring a just outcome in excise duty disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>