<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 888 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265613</link>
    <description>Penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules was reduced because the record did not show proper investigation at either the consignor&#039;s end or the consignee&#039;s end to verify actual supply and receipt of goods. The finding that the vehicle numbers in the invoices could not have carried the alleged quantity, and that the transactions were only paper transactions, was not supported by sufficient inquiry. In those factual circumstances, equal penalty was considered excessive, and the penalty was therefore reduced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 19:49:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 888 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265613</link>
      <description>Penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules was reduced because the record did not show proper investigation at either the consignor&#039;s end or the consignee&#039;s end to verify actual supply and receipt of goods. The finding that the vehicle numbers in the invoices could not have carried the alleged quantity, and that the transactions were only paper transactions, was not supported by sufficient inquiry. In those factual circumstances, equal penalty was considered excessive, and the penalty was therefore reduced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>