<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 881 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265606</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted total waiver of predeposit of duty and penalty amounting to 54.76 Crores imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The dispute arose from the Department&#039;s valuation of goods transferred for further processing, which the Applicants argued was not in line with the Valuation Rules and Act. The Tribunal found in favor of the Applicants, noting that the Department&#039;s valuation method did not consider the convergent agent&#039;s eligibility to claim credit, making the exercise revenue neutral. Recovery was stayed during the appeal&#039;s pendency, emphasizing the importance of proper valuation methods and provisional assessment in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 19:49:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 881 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265606</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted total waiver of predeposit of duty and penalty amounting to 54.76 Crores imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The dispute arose from the Department&#039;s valuation of goods transferred for further processing, which the Applicants argued was not in line with the Valuation Rules and Act. The Tribunal found in favor of the Applicants, noting that the Department&#039;s valuation method did not consider the convergent agent&#039;s eligibility to claim credit, making the exercise revenue neutral. Recovery was stayed during the appeal&#039;s pendency, emphasizing the importance of proper valuation methods and provisional assessment in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>