<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 25 - Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=684</link>
    <description>Extended limitation under the Central Excise Act could not be invoked where the Department had already taken and finalised the assessee&#039;s status as a work contractor, so the demand was time-barred. Even assuming manufacturer status, goods made at the construction site for use in the same project fell within the site-based exemption, as &quot;site&quot; was to be read liberally under the applicable notifications and circular. With the duty demand failing on limitation and on merits, penalty and interest were unsustainable and were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 25 - Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=684</link>
      <description>Extended limitation under the Central Excise Act could not be invoked where the Department had already taken and finalised the assessee&#039;s status as a work contractor, so the demand was time-barred. Even assuming manufacturer status, goods made at the construction site for use in the same project fell within the site-based exemption, as &quot;site&quot; was to be read liberally under the applicable notifications and circular. With the duty demand failing on limitation and on merits, penalty and interest were unsustainable and were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>