<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 872 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265597</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the demand imposed on the appellant under Rule 6(3)(b) for hazardous mother liquor, ruling di-calcium phosphate and enriched di-calcium phosphate as exempt by-products. Citing precedents like Narmada Gelatines Ltd. and Rallis India Ltd., the Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing consistency with Mumbai High Court decisions. The judgment underscores adherence to legal interpretations and past judgments, ensuring fairness and granting relief to the appellant based on settled legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 872 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265597</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the demand imposed on the appellant under Rule 6(3)(b) for hazardous mother liquor, ruling di-calcium phosphate and enriched di-calcium phosphate as exempt by-products. Citing precedents like Narmada Gelatines Ltd. and Rallis India Ltd., the Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing consistency with Mumbai High Court decisions. The judgment underscores adherence to legal interpretations and past judgments, ensuring fairness and granting relief to the appellant based on settled legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>