https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=683 The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal in a case involving clearance of goods from a job worker's premises without specific permission from the Commissioner. The Tribunal found that the procedural lapses in obtaining permission did not warrant higher duty demands, as the duty already paid for clearances was deemed appropriate. The Tribunal emphasized compliance with relevant rules and notifications, concluding that the differential duty based on individual soap pack MRPs was not justified. en-us Tue, 27 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=683 The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal in a case involving clearance of goods from a job worker's premises without specific permission from the Commissioner. The Tribunal found that the procedural lapses in obtaining permission did not warrant higher duty demands, as the duty already paid for clearances was deemed appropriate. The Tribunal emphasized compliance with relevant rules and notifications, concluding that the differential duty based on individual soap pack MRPs was not justified. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 27 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=683