<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 529 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174652</link>
    <description>Provisional release of detained export goods required only adequate security, not an additional bank guarantee of 25% of the consignment value, where samples had already been drawn and the likely exposure was limited to fine and penalty. The existing bank guarantee was treated as sufficient security for the present consignment, so release was allowed on a bond while keeping that guarantee alive. The request to refund or discharge the earlier bank guarantee was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 529 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174652</link>
      <description>Provisional release of detained export goods required only adequate security, not an additional bank guarantee of 25% of the consignment value, where samples had already been drawn and the likely exposure was limited to fine and penalty. The existing bank guarantee was treated as sufficient security for the present consignment, so release was allowed on a bond while keeping that guarantee alive. The request to refund or discharge the earlier bank guarantee was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>