<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 752 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174650</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee. The disallowance of Rs. 6,72,339 under section 41(1) of the Act was overturned as there was no evidence of cessation or remission of liability. Additionally, the disallowance of Rs. 52,156 on account of additional depreciation under the Technology Upgradation Fund Scheme was also reversed, with the Tribunal determining that the machinery purchased was eligible for 50% depreciation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 18:09:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 752 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174650</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee. The disallowance of Rs. 6,72,339 under section 41(1) of the Act was overturned as there was no evidence of cessation or remission of liability. Additionally, the disallowance of Rs. 52,156 on account of additional depreciation under the Technology Upgradation Fund Scheme was also reversed, with the Tribunal determining that the machinery purchased was eligible for 50% depreciation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>