<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 947 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174647</link>
    <description>The SC reiterated that convictions for abetment to suicide and cruelty cannot rest on material contradictions, vital omissions, or substantial improvements in prosecution evidence. It found that the letters and medical evidence did not reliably prove dowry demand or cruelty, and the deceased&#039;s mental disorder and depression weakened the alleged causal link to suicide, so the charges under Sections 306/34 and 498A/34 IPC were not established against the surviving appellants. The Court also held that an appellate court may reverse an acquittal only when the trial court&#039;s view is perverse or wholly unsustainable; because the High Court had not adequately displaced the trial court&#039;s reasoned appreciation of evidence, the acquittal was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 08:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 947 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174647</link>
      <description>The SC reiterated that convictions for abetment to suicide and cruelty cannot rest on material contradictions, vital omissions, or substantial improvements in prosecution evidence. It found that the letters and medical evidence did not reliably prove dowry demand or cruelty, and the deceased&#039;s mental disorder and depression weakened the alleged causal link to suicide, so the charges under Sections 306/34 and 498A/34 IPC were not established against the surviving appellants. The Court also held that an appellate court may reverse an acquittal only when the trial court&#039;s view is perverse or wholly unsustainable; because the High Court had not adequately displaced the trial court&#039;s reasoned appreciation of evidence, the acquittal was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>