<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 443 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174641</link>
    <description>The ITAT Amritsar partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The AO&#039;s failure to verify the books of account led to unjustified conclusions by the CIT(A), resulting in the reduction of the initial addition in remand proceedings. As the assessee provided documentary evidence, the AO&#039;s additions were deemed unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 17:21:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 443 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174641</link>
      <description>The ITAT Amritsar partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The AO&#039;s failure to verify the books of account led to unjustified conclusions by the CIT(A), resulting in the reduction of the initial addition in remand proceedings. As the assessee provided documentary evidence, the AO&#039;s additions were deemed unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>