<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1107 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174634</link>
    <description>Delegated authority to withdraw a statutory exemption is valid where the Legislature has retained the governing policy and the notification merely implements that policy. Withdrawal by gazette notification is legislative in character, so prior hearing and recorded reasons are not required; failure to lay the notification before the Legislature may be curable. Estate acquisition for preservation, protection and agrarian purposes falls within Article 31A protection where ancillary management of cultural assets does not alter its dominant object. No repugnancy arises where acquisition and land-reform laws operate in distinct legislative fields. Article 300A requires lawful deprivation generally serving a public purpose, while compensation must be assessed under the statutory scheme and legislative objective.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2017 16:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1107 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174634</link>
      <description>Delegated authority to withdraw a statutory exemption is valid where the Legislature has retained the governing policy and the notification merely implements that policy. Withdrawal by gazette notification is legislative in character, so prior hearing and recorded reasons are not required; failure to lay the notification before the Legislature may be curable. Estate acquisition for preservation, protection and agrarian purposes falls within Article 31A protection where ancillary management of cultural assets does not alter its dominant object. No repugnancy arises where acquisition and land-reform laws operate in distinct legislative fields. Article 300A requires lawful deprivation generally serving a public purpose, while compensation must be assessed under the statutory scheme and legislative objective.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>