https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174634 Section 110 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act validly authorised withdrawal of the linaloe exemption by notification because the Legislature retained the policy choice and the power operated within that statutory scheme; prior hearing, recorded reasons and prior laying were not treated as conditions that invalidated the notification. The Roerich Estate Acquisition Act was treated as a measure of preservation and agrarian reform, so it fell within Article 31A and was not defeated by repugnancy or lack of assent. The Article 300A challenge also failed because the Act was held to serve a public purpose, and compensation was assessed by the statute and its scheme. en-us Tue, 09 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Jun 2017 16:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174634 Section 110 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act validly authorised withdrawal of the linaloe exemption by notification because the Legislature retained the policy choice and the power operated within that statutory scheme; prior hearing, recorded reasons and prior laying were not treated as conditions that invalidated the notification. The Roerich Estate Acquisition Act was treated as a measure of preservation and agrarian reform, so it fell within Article 31A and was not defeated by repugnancy or lack of assent. The Article 300A challenge also failed because the Act was held to serve a public purpose, and compensation was assessed by the statute and its scheme. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174634