<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 965 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174624</link>
    <description>Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act applies only to a personal search and not to the search of a bag, container, vehicle or premises. Where the recovery was from a bag carried by the accused, the procedural safeguard under Section 50 was inapplicable. The text also notes that official witnesses may be relied on where their evidence is credible, and the absence of support from one independent witness does not by itself discredit the prosecution when the record shows intact seals and no material contradiction. On that basis, the prosecution version was treated as sustainable and the contrary view was not.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 09:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 965 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174624</link>
      <description>Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act applies only to a personal search and not to the search of a bag, container, vehicle or premises. Where the recovery was from a bag carried by the accused, the procedural safeguard under Section 50 was inapplicable. The text also notes that official witnesses may be relied on where their evidence is credible, and the absence of support from one independent witness does not by itself discredit the prosecution when the record shows intact seals and no material contradiction. On that basis, the prosecution version was treated as sustainable and the contrary view was not.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>