<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (8) TMI 311 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174622</link>
    <description>Section 33 of the Indian Evidence Act permits prior testimony from an earlier judicial proceeding when the witness is unavailable and the statutory conditions are met. The second proviso protects the party against whom that evidence was originally given, namely the party who had the right and opportunity to cross-examine the witness in that proceeding. A party who produced and examined the witness in the earlier case is not treated as the protected adverse party. On that construction, the prior evidence was admissible in the later proceeding, subject to proof and weight at trial, and the refusal to receive the testimony could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:48:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (8) TMI 311 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174622</link>
      <description>Section 33 of the Indian Evidence Act permits prior testimony from an earlier judicial proceeding when the witness is unavailable and the statutory conditions are met. The second proviso protects the party against whom that evidence was originally given, namely the party who had the right and opportunity to cross-examine the witness in that proceeding. A party who produced and examined the witness in the earlier case is not treated as the protected adverse party. On that construction, the prior evidence was admissible in the later proceeding, subject to proof and weight at trial, and the refusal to receive the testimony could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>