https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174621 In an appeal by special leave, the SC reiterated that concurrent findings of fact will not be disturbed unless perverse or unsupported by evidence. It held that failure to examine independent bystanders was not fatal where the examined witnesses were reliable and the surrounding probabilities supported the prosecution version. Minor inconsistencies between an injured witness's earlier statements and trial evidence were treated as matters of detail, not grounds to reject otherwise trustworthy testimony. On the evidence, the murder conviction of appellants 5 and 6 under Section 302 was set aside for want of proof of their participation, but their conviction for attempt to murder under Section 307 read with Section 149 was sustained. en-us Fri, 05 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:39:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174621 In an appeal by special leave, the SC reiterated that concurrent findings of fact will not be disturbed unless perverse or unsupported by evidence. It held that failure to examine independent bystanders was not fatal where the examined witnesses were reliable and the surrounding probabilities supported the prosecution version. Minor inconsistencies between an injured witness's earlier statements and trial evidence were treated as matters of detail, not grounds to reject otherwise trustworthy testimony. On the evidence, the murder conviction of appellants 5 and 6 under Section 302 was set aside for want of proof of their participation, but their conviction for attempt to murder under Section 307 read with Section 149 was sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174621