<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 919 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174609</link>
    <description>Interim protection was continued where the first appeal against an assessment demand remained pending, with the Court directing that status quo as on the date of the order would operate until disposal of the appeal. The appellate authority was also required to decide the first appeal within two months, reflecting a direction for expeditious disposal while preserving the existing position in the meantime.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 10:18:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 919 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174609</link>
      <description>Interim protection was continued where the first appeal against an assessment demand remained pending, with the Court directing that status quo as on the date of the order would operate until disposal of the appeal. The appellate authority was also required to decide the first appeal within two months, reflecting a direction for expeditious disposal while preserving the existing position in the meantime.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>