https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265587 The Court allowed the challenge against Ext.P6 order confirming service tax and penalty, directing the 2nd respondent to reconsider the matter in line with the decision of the Larger Bench of the Appellate Tribunal. The Court emphasized the need for judicial discipline and instructed a fresh review of the case, granting the petitioner an opportunity to present their case within two months from the date of the judgment. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions for a fair assessment of the petitioner's liability to service tax as an agent of a foreign company. en-us Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Jan 2016 12:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265587 The Court allowed the challenge against Ext.P6 order confirming service tax and penalty, directing the 2nd respondent to reconsider the matter in line with the decision of the Larger Bench of the Appellate Tribunal. The Court emphasized the need for judicial discipline and instructed a fresh review of the case, granting the petitioner an opportunity to present their case within two months from the date of the judgment. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions for a fair assessment of the petitioner's liability to service tax as an agent of a foreign company. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265587