<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 857 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265582</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the services received did not qualify as Goods Transport Agency (GTA) Service due to the absence of consignment notes from the transporters. As a result, the appellant was found not liable for the levy and collection of service tax, interest, or penalty under the GTA service category, overturning the decisions of the lower authorities. No costs were imposed on the appellant as a result of this judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 06:41:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 857 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265582</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the services received did not qualify as Goods Transport Agency (GTA) Service due to the absence of consignment notes from the transporters. As a result, the appellant was found not liable for the levy and collection of service tax, interest, or penalty under the GTA service category, overturning the decisions of the lower authorities. No costs were imposed on the appellant as a result of this judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>