<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 46 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=673</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the interest demand in two cases involving the transfer of Service Tax between accounts. In both instances, delays were attributed to departmental processes and not the fault of the appellants. The decisions emphasized the significance of accurately assigning responsibility for delays in tax transfers to determine interest demands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 46 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=673</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the interest demand in two cases involving the transfer of Service Tax between accounts. In both instances, delays were attributed to departmental processes and not the fault of the appellants. The decisions emphasized the significance of accurately assigning responsibility for delays in tax transfers to determine interest demands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>