<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 844 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265569</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order, clarifying that Rule 11 of the Cenvat Credit Rules does not apply when multiple products are manufactured, some exempt and some dutiable, in cases involving the conversion of units from EOU to DTA. The appellant, a former EOU now a DTA unit, was deemed eligible to utilize the CENVAT credit for discharging duty liability on products other than exempted agricultural tractors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2016 12:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 844 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265569</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order, clarifying that Rule 11 of the Cenvat Credit Rules does not apply when multiple products are manufactured, some exempt and some dutiable, in cases involving the conversion of units from EOU to DTA. The appellant, a former EOU now a DTA unit, was deemed eligible to utilize the CENVAT credit for discharging duty liability on products other than exempted agricultural tractors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>