<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 840 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265565</link>
    <description>The appellate authority found discrepancies between the weighment slip and recorded stock, leading to the setting aside of the adjudication. The Assessee&#039;s request for relevant defense documents was denied, and the lack of detailed reasoning regarding goods allegedly stolen raised concerns. The decision to set aside the adjudication without proper examination and absence of cross-examination were deemed illogical. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the Adjudicating authority for a fair assessment, directing the provision of necessary documents for defense and allowing cross-examination to ensure justice and adherence to natural justice principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 06:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 840 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265565</link>
      <description>The appellate authority found discrepancies between the weighment slip and recorded stock, leading to the setting aside of the adjudication. The Assessee&#039;s request for relevant defense documents was denied, and the lack of detailed reasoning regarding goods allegedly stolen raised concerns. The decision to set aside the adjudication without proper examination and absence of cross-examination were deemed illogical. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the Adjudicating authority for a fair assessment, directing the provision of necessary documents for defense and allowing cross-examination to ensure justice and adherence to natural justice principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>