<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 827 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265552</link>
    <description>A secured creditor may, after taking measures under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act, separately assign the debt under Section 5 even while proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal are pending. The debt-assignment notice is distinct from a sale of the secured asset; assignment is an independent commercial transfer in which the transferee steps into the creditor&#039;s shoes and the borrower&#039;s liability remains unchanged. Pending challenge to a sale notice before the Tribunal does not bar this separate exercise of transfer rights, and the assignment price is a matter for the secured creditor. The writ challenge to the assignment notice was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 827 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265552</link>
      <description>A secured creditor may, after taking measures under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act, separately assign the debt under Section 5 even while proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal are pending. The debt-assignment notice is distinct from a sale of the secured asset; assignment is an independent commercial transfer in which the transferee steps into the creditor&#039;s shoes and the borrower&#039;s liability remains unchanged. Pending challenge to a sale notice before the Tribunal does not bar this separate exercise of transfer rights, and the assignment price is a matter for the secured creditor. The writ challenge to the assignment notice was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>