<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 826 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265551</link>
    <description>FTC on income exempt under s.10A: construing s.90(1)(a)(ii) (post-FA 2003) with the India-USA DTAA, the HC held Art.25 does not require tax payment in India as a precondition; credit is allowable for US federal/state taxes paid on such income, and rejection for want of a revised return was impermissible once particulars were furnished; FTC was allowed. Under the India-Canada DTAA, Art.23 requires the same income be taxed in both jurisdictions; where s.10A exempts it in India, FTC is unavailable; the disallowance was sustained to that extent. Unavailed MODVAT credit is not &quot;income&quot; u/s 2(24) until availed; deletion of taxability was upheld. Director commission, being part of salary, had to be allocated to the relevant unit; disallowance impacting s.10A benefit was set aside. AMC and monitor profits directly linked to manufactured computers were eligible u/s 80-IB (excluding separately traded items); revenue&#039;s exclusions were set aside, and certain issues were remanded for fresh computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2025 18:24:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 826 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265551</link>
      <description>FTC on income exempt under s.10A: construing s.90(1)(a)(ii) (post-FA 2003) with the India-USA DTAA, the HC held Art.25 does not require tax payment in India as a precondition; credit is allowable for US federal/state taxes paid on such income, and rejection for want of a revised return was impermissible once particulars were furnished; FTC was allowed. Under the India-Canada DTAA, Art.23 requires the same income be taxed in both jurisdictions; where s.10A exempts it in India, FTC is unavailable; the disallowance was sustained to that extent. Unavailed MODVAT credit is not &quot;income&quot; u/s 2(24) until availed; deletion of taxability was upheld. Director commission, being part of salary, had to be allocated to the relevant unit; disallowance impacting s.10A benefit was set aside. AMC and monitor profits directly linked to manufactured computers were eligible u/s 80-IB (excluding separately traded items); revenue&#039;s exclusions were set aside, and certain issues were remanded for fresh computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>