<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 810 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265535</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income was not justified as the errors were bona fide and corrected by the assessee. The Tribunal clarified that the penalty for concealment did not apply in this case. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the penalty was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 17:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 810 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265535</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income was not justified as the errors were bona fide and corrected by the assessee. The Tribunal clarified that the penalty for concealment did not apply in this case. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the penalty was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>