<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 19 - Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=665</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order-in-appeal. It emphasized the importance of following statutory provisions for appeals and rectifications, stating that Section 74 could not be used to bypass the appeal process under Section 85. The decision highlighted the significance of proper assessment procedures and adherence to legal frameworks in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 19 - Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=665</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order-in-appeal. It emphasized the importance of following statutory provisions for appeals and rectifications, stating that Section 74 could not be used to bypass the appeal process under Section 85. The decision highlighted the significance of proper assessment procedures and adherence to legal frameworks in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>