https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174590 The Karnataka HC held that writ petitions are not maintainable under Section 35(g) of the Central Excise Act, allowing appeals for impugned orders. The writ petitions were disposed of with liberty to file appeals, and the benefit of interim order was extended for one month to facilitate appeal filing. en-us Sat, 22 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 May 2017 11:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174590 The Karnataka HC held that writ petitions are not maintainable under Section 35(g) of the Central Excise Act, allowing appeals for impugned orders. The writ petitions were disposed of with liberty to file appeals, and the benefit of interim order was extended for one month to facilitate appeal filing. Case-Laws Central Excise Sat, 22 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174590