<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Importer Wins Case on Mis-declared Goods: Diethyl Hexyl Phthalate vs. Di-Octyl Phthalate, Differences in Quality and Price Validated.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=25269</link>
    <description>Mis-declaration of goods – declaration of import as Diethyl Hexyl Pthalate (DEHP) instead of Di-Octyl Pthalate (DOP) – technical literature shows that DOP and DEHP are used interchangeably and that contention of manufacturer of products and importer cannot be brushed aside that products were different in quality and price - Demand set aside - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 13:42:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 13:42:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Importer Wins Case on Mis-declared Goods: Diethyl Hexyl Phthalate vs. Di-Octyl Phthalate, Differences in Quality and Price Validated.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=25269</link>
      <description>Mis-declaration of goods – declaration of import as Diethyl Hexyl Pthalate (DEHP) instead of Di-Octyl Pthalate (DOP) – technical literature shows that DOP and DEHP are used interchangeably and that contention of manufacturer of products and importer cannot be brushed aside that products were different in quality and price - Demand set aside - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 13:42:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=25269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>