<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 959 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174581</link>
    <description>Preventive detention requires the detaining authority to form subjective satisfaction on the basis of all relevant material considered together before finalising the grounds. Where draft grounds were prepared before additional documents were received and no fresh review or re-formulation followed, the process amounted to impermissible piecemeal consideration of material. The detention order was therefore invalid because the authority&#039;s satisfaction was vitiated by incomplete and phased assessment of the record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 12:57:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 959 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174581</link>
      <description>Preventive detention requires the detaining authority to form subjective satisfaction on the basis of all relevant material considered together before finalising the grounds. Where draft grounds were prepared before additional documents were received and no fresh review or re-formulation followed, the process amounted to impermissible piecemeal consideration of material. The detention order was therefore invalid because the authority&#039;s satisfaction was vitiated by incomplete and phased assessment of the record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>