https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265509 The appellant filed a stay application against a Service Tax demand confirmed by an Order-in-Original, including penalties under Sections 77 (1), 77 (2), and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant's arguments regarding the demand related to dredging service were considered contentious, requiring further examination. The appellant was directed to pay Rs. 5.00 Lakhs within 8 weeks and report compliance by a specified date to the CESTAT Registry. A stay on the recovery of the remaining amounts, interest, and penalties was granted pending the appeal's disposal. en-us Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265509 The appellant filed a stay application against a Service Tax demand confirmed by an Order-in-Original, including penalties under Sections 77 (1), 77 (2), and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant's arguments regarding the demand related to dredging service were considered contentious, requiring further examination. The appellant was directed to pay Rs. 5.00 Lakhs within 8 weeks and report compliance by a specified date to the CESTAT Registry. A stay on the recovery of the remaining amounts, interest, and penalties was granted pending the appeal's disposal. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265509