https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265506 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the order-in-appeal confirming a service tax demand under cargo handling service. Relying on precedent judgments, the Tribunal held that activities like loading, unloading, and stacking of sugar bags within factory premises do not constitute cargo handling service as per Section 65(25) of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal found in favor of the respondent, citing established precedents and rejecting the Revenue's arguments, ultimately upholding the order setting aside the service tax demand. en-us Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Sep 2015 10:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265506 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the order-in-appeal confirming a service tax demand under cargo handling service. Relying on precedent judgments, the Tribunal held that activities like loading, unloading, and stacking of sugar bags within factory premises do not constitute cargo handling service as per Section 65(25) of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal found in favor of the respondent, citing established precedents and rejecting the Revenue's arguments, ultimately upholding the order setting aside the service tax demand. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265506