<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 770 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265495</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the interest demand and penalty imposed on the appellants for wrongly availing Cenvat Credit invoiced to the Head Office but utilized by a different unit. The Tribunal ruled that since the credit was promptly reversed upon audit detection, no interest was payable, as per the High Court of Gujarat&#039;s decision. Additionally, the penalty under Section 11AC was deemed inapplicable due to the lack of intent to evade duty. The Order In Original was upheld with modifications, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 May 2016 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 770 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265495</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the interest demand and penalty imposed on the appellants for wrongly availing Cenvat Credit invoiced to the Head Office but utilized by a different unit. The Tribunal ruled that since the credit was promptly reversed upon audit detection, no interest was payable, as per the High Court of Gujarat&#039;s decision. Additionally, the penalty under Section 11AC was deemed inapplicable due to the lack of intent to evade duty. The Order In Original was upheld with modifications, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>