<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 758 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265483</link>
    <description>Licence fees for post-winding-up use of premises by an Official Liquidator to store and value company assets were treated as expenses of winding up, with priority over claims under Sections 529, 529A and 530 of the Companies Act, 1956. The premises had to be vacated once the movables were shifted to another company property. The security deposit could be adjusted against licence fee arrears, and only the balance, if any, remained payable in liquidation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 12:27:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 758 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265483</link>
      <description>Licence fees for post-winding-up use of premises by an Official Liquidator to store and value company assets were treated as expenses of winding up, with priority over claims under Sections 529, 529A and 530 of the Companies Act, 1956. The premises had to be vacated once the movables were shifted to another company property. The security deposit could be adjusted against licence fee arrears, and only the balance, if any, remained payable in liquidation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>