https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174572 The Supreme Court upheld the Division Bench's decision, emphasizing impartiality and fairness in disciplinary proceedings. The Court found bias in the disciplinary inquiry committee, consisting of members involved in the decision-making process, leading to prejudice against the respondent. Due to this bias, the Court reinstated the respondent with 50% back wages and continuity of service, highlighting the importance of objectivity in such proceedings and the adverse effects of perceived bias on fairness. The decision aimed to rectify the injustice caused by the biased inquiry and ensure the respondent's rights were upheld. en-us Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174572 The Supreme Court upheld the Division Bench's decision, emphasizing impartiality and fairness in disciplinary proceedings. The Court found bias in the disciplinary inquiry committee, consisting of members involved in the decision-making process, leading to prejudice against the respondent. Due to this bias, the Court reinstated the respondent with 50% back wages and continuity of service, highlighting the importance of objectivity in such proceedings and the adverse effects of perceived bias on fairness. The decision aimed to rectify the injustice caused by the biased inquiry and ensure the respondent's rights were upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174572