<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 744 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265469</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to restrict the addition for job work receipts and delete the addition for concealed sale of scrap. The issue of concealed sales was remanded to the A.O. for fresh verification. The Tribunal deleted the addition for late depositing ESI &amp;amp; PF dues, following the jurisdictional High Court&#039;s ruling. The appeal by the revenue and the cross-objection by the assessee were partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2015 16:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 744 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265469</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to restrict the addition for job work receipts and delete the addition for concealed sale of scrap. The issue of concealed sales was remanded to the A.O. for fresh verification. The Tribunal deleted the addition for late depositing ESI &amp;amp; PF dues, following the jurisdictional High Court&#039;s ruling. The appeal by the revenue and the cross-objection by the assessee were partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>