<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 724 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265449</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the writ petition challenging the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s refusal to grant an unconditional stay on duty and penalty demanded under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court emphasized the need for a strong prima facie case and balance of convenience at the interim stage. It noted the appellate authority&#039;s findings and upheld the directive for a specific deposit, finding no grounds for interference in the writ jurisdiction due to lack of jurisdictional errors or illusory remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2015 18:53:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 724 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265449</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the writ petition challenging the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s refusal to grant an unconditional stay on duty and penalty demanded under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court emphasized the need for a strong prima facie case and balance of convenience at the interim stage. It noted the appellate authority&#039;s findings and upheld the directive for a specific deposit, finding no grounds for interference in the writ jurisdiction due to lack of jurisdictional errors or illusory remedies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>