https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265441 The court allowed the review application, setting aside the previous order and restoring the writ petition for further proceedings before an appropriate Bench. An interim order was issued to prevent the department from taking coercive action against the petitioner. The court emphasized the validity of the petitioner's case for review based on new information provided, leading to the allowance of the review application. The matter was scheduled for hearing in June 2015, with instructions for the respondents to file a counter in response to the petition. en-us Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Dec 2015 11:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265441 The court allowed the review application, setting aside the previous order and restoring the writ petition for further proceedings before an appropriate Bench. An interim order was issued to prevent the department from taking coercive action against the petitioner. The court emphasized the validity of the petitioner's case for review based on new information provided, leading to the allowance of the review application. The matter was scheduled for hearing in June 2015, with instructions for the respondents to file a counter in response to the petition. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265441