<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 706 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265431</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the appellate authority&#039;s order, directing the petitioner to pursue the remedy of filing an appeal before the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Court emphasized the reasonableness of the requirement to deposit 10% of the tax confirmed and highlighted the importance of following proper appeal procedures, considering jurisdiction, and plea of limitation in administrative decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 706 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265431</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the appellate authority&#039;s order, directing the petitioner to pursue the remedy of filing an appeal before the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Court emphasized the reasonableness of the requirement to deposit 10% of the tax confirmed and highlighted the importance of following proper appeal procedures, considering jurisdiction, and plea of limitation in administrative decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>