https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265422 The Allahabad High Court dismissed the appeal filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging the order of the Custom, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appellant's request for an extension of time to comply with the deposit condition was denied by the Tribunal, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The High Court emphasized the finality of orders passed during legal proceedings and ruled that once the appellant withdrew the appeal after the Tribunal's final dismissal order, challenging interregnum orders was not permissible. Compliance with procedural requirements, such as deposit conditions, is crucial in appellate procedures under the Central Excise Act, 1944. en-us Wed, 03 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Sep 2017 18:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265422 The Allahabad High Court dismissed the appeal filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging the order of the Custom, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appellant's request for an extension of time to comply with the deposit condition was denied by the Tribunal, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The High Court emphasized the finality of orders passed during legal proceedings and ruled that once the appellant withdrew the appeal after the Tribunal's final dismissal order, challenging interregnum orders was not permissible. Compliance with procedural requirements, such as deposit conditions, is crucial in appellate procedures under the Central Excise Act, 1944. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 03 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265422