<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 693 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265418</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, directing the Tribunal to re-examine the appellant&#039;s financial hardship considering the audited balance sheet. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was criticized for inaccurately assessing the appellant&#039;s financial position. The Court emphasized the reliability of audited accounts, highlighting a net loss. The Tribunal&#039;s finding of profit was deemed erroneous, and the appellant was instructed to deposit Rs. 16.00 lakhs for the appeal to proceed. The High Court questioned the reversal of credit taken by the appellant, noting no financial gain. The appeal was disposed of, requiring the appellant to make the deposit within a specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2015 18:51:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 693 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265418</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, directing the Tribunal to re-examine the appellant&#039;s financial hardship considering the audited balance sheet. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was criticized for inaccurately assessing the appellant&#039;s financial position. The Court emphasized the reliability of audited accounts, highlighting a net loss. The Tribunal&#039;s finding of profit was deemed erroneous, and the appellant was instructed to deposit Rs. 16.00 lakhs for the appeal to proceed. The High Court questioned the reversal of credit taken by the appellant, noting no financial gain. The appeal was disposed of, requiring the appellant to make the deposit within a specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>