https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265411 The High Court held that despite the availability of an appeal under Section-35G(2) of the Act, a writ petition was maintainable as it was filed within the limitation period. The court overruled the objection raised by the Central Excise Department and directed the Tribunal to hear the appeal on its merits. The petitioner, who had initially failed to deposit the pre-condition amount, later deposited the entire excise duty demanded during the proceedings. The High Court's decision aimed at ensuring justice by setting aside the Tribunal's orders and providing directions for a timely hearing of the appeal. en-us Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Oct 2015 11:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265411 The High Court held that despite the availability of an appeal under Section-35G(2) of the Act, a writ petition was maintainable as it was filed within the limitation period. The court overruled the objection raised by the Central Excise Department and directed the Tribunal to hear the appeal on its merits. The petitioner, who had initially failed to deposit the pre-condition amount, later deposited the entire excise duty demanded during the proceedings. The High Court's decision aimed at ensuring justice by setting aside the Tribunal's orders and providing directions for a timely hearing of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265411