<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 680 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265405</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeals under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, finding no merit and stating no substantial question of law arose. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to direct payment of 15% of the duty demanded was upheld, considering undue hardship to the appellant. An extension was granted for depositing the amount, with a condition for hearing the appeals on merits if the payment was made by a specified date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2015 18:50:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 680 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265405</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeals under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, finding no merit and stating no substantial question of law arose. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to direct payment of 15% of the duty demanded was upheld, considering undue hardship to the appellant. An extension was granted for depositing the amount, with a condition for hearing the appeals on merits if the payment was made by a specified date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>