<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 678 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265403</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the applicability of the extended period of limitation under Section 11A, limiting the demands to the normal period based on past judgments. The assessee&#039;s claim for exemption under Notification no.8/2000-CE was rejected, with the demand confirmed for wrongly availing the exemption. The Tribunal upheld the demands for the normal period, emphasizing the assessees&#039; reasonable belief in entitlement despite subsequent legal developments. The Court found no merit in invoking Section 11A for the assessees&#039; actions and dismissed the appeal, citing past case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 10:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 678 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265403</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the applicability of the extended period of limitation under Section 11A, limiting the demands to the normal period based on past judgments. The assessee&#039;s claim for exemption under Notification no.8/2000-CE was rejected, with the demand confirmed for wrongly availing the exemption. The Tribunal upheld the demands for the normal period, emphasizing the assessees&#039; reasonable belief in entitlement despite subsequent legal developments. The Court found no merit in invoking Section 11A for the assessees&#039; actions and dismissed the appeal, citing past case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>