https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265402 Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is confined to patent error, manifest mistake, or discovery of new and material facts unavailable despite due diligence. It cannot be used to reopen the entire matter or to re-argue the case on merits. As the grounds raised sought a fresh hearing without showing any reviewable infirmity on the record or any newly discovered fact, the review petition was not maintainable and was rightly rejected. en-us Thu, 15 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 11 Oct 2015 18:50:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265402 Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is confined to patent error, manifest mistake, or discovery of new and material facts unavailable despite due diligence. It cannot be used to reopen the entire matter or to re-argue the case on merits. As the grounds raised sought a fresh hearing without showing any reviewable infirmity on the record or any newly discovered fact, the review petition was not maintainable and was rightly rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 15 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265402